How to research web reviews with dated source evidence
Find recent espresso-machine reviews, read up to five articles and write a brief with source links and publication dates
On this page
Find espresso-machine reviews published in the last 30 days and summarize what the reviewers tested. Use search to locate articles, then retrieve up to five pages so the brief can link its conclusions to the review text
The finished brief should name the machines discussed, summarize the reviewers' observations and link to the sources. Keep older reviews, pages without publication dates and failed downloads in a separate notes section
Set up https://purrkey.app/SKILL.md. Find espresso machine reviews
published in the last 30 days. Record explicit start and end dates.
Inspect TinyFish Search and Fetch. Search one web-results page,
choose up to five distinct relevant article URLs and fetch Markdown.
Verify publication dates in the page text. Keep older or undated
reviews and failed fetches outside the main brief. For usable reviews,
record the tested model and summarize observations with source links.
Distinguish hands-on tests from specifications. Do not fetch more
pages to replace excluded sources. Return the brief and source notes.Search within a defined publication window
Ask the agent to convert “last 30 days” into start and end dates when it runs the task. Use tinyfish.search with espresso machine review, or your exact model name if you want a review of one machine

TinyFish Search. Source: Purrkey tool directory, captured November 5, 2026
The checked inputs include query, domain_type, after_date, before_date and a zero-based page. Use the web search type and first page after checking the current contract. Web results can include specialist review sites as well as news sources
Choose up to five distinct article URLs that appear relevant. Remove duplicate links and store listings before fetching. Search snippets help choose pages to read, but the page text is needed to confirm the review's date and content
Fetch the selected articles
Pass the URLs to tinyfish.fetch with the Markdown format. The tool accepts a list of URLs; this task uses at most five

TinyFish Fetch. Source: Purrkey tool directory, captured November 5, 2026
Check each page separately. A successful download containing only a consent notice or navigation has not provided the review. Record it as unavailable and continue with the readable articles, without inventing the missing text or expanding the five-page limit
Check publication dates in those articles. An older review with a recent update is still outside this task's newly published window; list it in the notes if it may be useful later. Leave an absent publication date unknown. Record the collection date separately so it is clear when the pages were retrieved
Summarize the tests each reviewer describes
For each usable article, identify the machine model and look for descriptions of the reviewer's own use or tests. Summarize the observations with a link to the article and enough context to locate the relevant passage
Keep manufacturer specifications separate from test observations. A listed pressure rating, for example, is not a reviewer's measurement of coffee quality. If the article only repeats specifications, describe it as a buying guide rather than a hands-on test
When reviewers disagree, report what each says about the same model. Check whether they describe different settings or methods before offering an explanation. If a page quotes another review, identify that source rather than counting the quotation as a second independent test
Write the brief with links to the reviews
Group the main findings by machine or comparison topic, depending on the articles available. Put the source link beside each finding, then list the article titles, publication dates, update dates when present and collection date underneath
Use the notes section for older or undated articles, unreadable pages and questions the retrieved reviews did not answer. This keeps the brief useful even when fewer than five pages qualify, without implying that the search covered every recent review
Estimated tool cost for one search and five pages
The TinyFish listings, captured November 5, 2026, show these prices:
| Planned work | Billing unit | Quantity | Estimated tool cost |
|---|---|---|---|
tinyfish.search | $0.005 per call | 1 | $0.005 |
tinyfish.fetch | $0.001 per successful URL | Up to 5 | $0.005 |
| Full plan | One search and one fetch batch | $0.010 |
The estimate assumes five successful URL fetches. A retrieved page can still be excluded from the brief because of its date or content; that editorial decision does not undo the fetch. One batch with five successful URLs has five billing units. Extra searches and Agent model fees are excluded; this plan uses the named paid tools, not the separately listed free endpoints
Start with TinyFish Search and the model or product category you need to research